Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Jesus Christianity

Reads like it should be a tasteless onion article. But it isn't. A guy named Jesus Christianity threatened gay people with a bomb.

"Jesus Christianity, 34, of Penarth, shouted Bible quotes at passengers going to Pride Cymru in August.
...
"Mr James said Christianity was not actually carrying a bomb and despite having a toy gun, there was no evidence he was planning to attack anyone.
"Ruth Smith, defending, said Christianity suffered from 'clear psychiatric difficulties', adding that he had a dislike of public transport which led to his outbursts.
"Judge Neil Bidder QC said he accepted Christianity was not a terrorist and was sorry for his verbal attacks, but said he was 'motivated by hostility to homosexuality'."

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-43373389

3.14

HAPPY PI DAY!!

Google's Pi Day Doodle

Monday, March 12, 2018

Chess, relativity and knowing other people... #mondaymusical

Chess Stuff

So, I really enjoy the musical Chess. It is complex and weird and stupid and beautiful. I've been thinking about what it seems to say about knowing other people.

***Impending stream-of-consciousness warning***

Brief <over-simplified> synopsis:

The likable Soviet chess player (Anatoly) defeats the unlikable American chess player (Freddie) at a tournament and promptly defects from the Soviet Union to England. During the tournament, Anatoly and Florence (Freddie's...umm...girlfriend? Lover? Manager? Coach? All of the above?) fall in love and she leaves Freddie for Anatoly. There is a plot to humiliate Anatoly by distracting him at the next tournament (they bring his wife to confront him about having abandoned her) in hopes of forcing him to lose at which time he would be shuffled back to the Soviet Union in disgrace. Instead he wins and decides to go back anyways.

Like I said: complex/weird/stupid. Beautiful music.

Florence sings a song somewhat early in the show outlining what seems to be her life's philosophy. Basically, she believes that you can't rely on anybody, so why let other people rely on you. The chorus sections all have different words, but express the same basic idea:

Everybody's playing the game
But nobody's rules are the same
Nobody's on nobody's side
Better learn to go it alone
Recognize you're out on your own
Nobody's on nobody's side
...
Never take a stranger's advice
Never let a friend fool you twice
Nobody's on nobody's side
Never be the first to believe
Never be the last to deceive
Nobody's on nobody's side.


Main thought from this song: don't trust people; you can never know they won't hurt you.

Toward the end of the show, Florence sings a duet with Svetlana (Anatoly's wife) about how well they each know Anatoly. Florence has tried to convince Anatoly to throw the tournament so the Soviets will release her father from prison. Svetlana has tried to convince Anatoly to throw the tournament and come home because otherwise she and their children will be sent to (presumably) Siberia. 

[Florence]
Looking back, I could have played it differently
Won a few more moments, who can tell?
But it took time to understand the man
Now at least I know I know him well
...
[Svetlana (Florence in harmony)]
Looking back I could have played it differently
Learned about the man before I fell
But I was ever so much younger then
Now at least I know I know him well
...
[Both, sort of]
But in the end he needs a little bit more than me:
More security/He needs his fantasy and freedom
I know him so well.

It took time to understand him
I know him so well

What sticks out to me in this ballad is that they are declaring how well they know the man who they feel has betrayed them (or who they expect is about to betray them). Florence especially seems blind to her incompatible beliefs that people cannot be trusted because of their obscure interior motives, and that she knows Anatoly's interior motives well enough to not be trusted. Turns out that they are halfway there. He refuses to throw the tournament. Then he negotiates to get Florence's father released and returns to his family in the Soviet Union. So he fails them in exactly the way they expected (by not throwing the tournament as they asked) while also coming through for them (by getting Florence's father released and returning home to Svetlana).

What is interesting to me about this through-line (does it count as a theme?), is the conversation it is having about knowing/understanding other people and trusting them.

(lite) Relativity Stuff

I had an interesting conversation with a friend about a general belief in relativity. Although I think he was probably right that the main definition/idea as defined in philosophy doesn't fully match what I actually believe, I think it is the closest we have to language that can accurately express what I believe.

I think that there is a sense in which everything is relative.

A person who lives in Denver is not going to have the same view of the Rocky Mountains that a person in Seattle has. If a person in North Dakota and a person in Pennsylvania want to meet up in Illinois, they cannot follow the same directions (if they follow the same directions one might get to Illinois, but the other will end up in the middle of an ocean). It's a whole "Blind Men and the Elephant" thing. The elephant is a thing, but each person's understanding of the elephant is different. They are all right and all wrong simultaneously.

To put it in Christian-ish terms:each person's internal life and personal response to the leading of the Holy Spirit is what determines the path their lives take (and their final destination). And we cannot know a person's internal life.

Knowing Other People Stuff

To beat a dead horse, we have little way of truly knowing that we know other people well. But we still strive to. Even knowing that our understanding of other people (and their understanding of us) will always be flawed. Even after decades of knowing intimately.

And even in that knowing, some people will be less knowable to us than others because of our experiences. I will always have difficulty understanding the experience of black people in America. I will never truly understand the extent of sexual harassment of women in the workplace. The idea of a parent abusing their child is entirely foreign to me.

And not attaining a perfect understanding of another human is not a good enough reason not to strive for a better understanding of them.

Knowing me

If you are straight, you will never fully understand what it is like to be queer. There are parts of being queer that I will never understand. Don't take that to mean that I don't want you to try to understand me. Know that I will never fully understand what it is to be straight.


That uncertainty is beautiful to me.

Sunday, March 11, 2018

Confession:

I don't believe the average straight human understands how freeing it was to stop lying about my attraction to other men. Or how damaging it was to encourage the lie that I am attracted to women.

Saturday, March 10, 2018

lies i have to stop believing


I will die alone.
     unless some
     straight,
     christian,
     visitation-care couple
        take pity on me and come for a visit.

Because...
...a man who falls in love with a man will abandon me for a quick trick.
...my chosen family are too busy.
...my family will disown me.

Because gays can't love.
And gays can't be loved.
In sickness. Or in health.


Monday, March 5, 2018

Here goes...

So. I had an idea pop in my head last time someone said to me about gay people, "I just don't agree with their lifestyle."

That idea?
I should write a blog about my gay lifestyle.

Because I would love to hear why my lifestyle is disagreeable.

Because my life is not what they think it is.

So, story the first:

Tonight, I cleaned out my cat's litter box. The end.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

thoughts about being a "gay Christian"

Over the past couple days I read “God and the Gay Christian”by Matthew Vines and “God and the Gay Christian?” edited by R. Albert Mohler Jr. (a collection of critical responses to Vine’s arguments by several prominent SBC theologians, released nearly simultaneously with Vines’ book in free eBook form).

I am disappointed that the response from the SBC so fully ignored several of Vines’ core arguments. For example, I would have liked to see a discussion regarding the cultural shift in understanding related to human attraction (specifically that same-sex attraction was believed to occur for anyone when pleasure was pursued in excess, rather than being an orientation in which one either is or is not attracted to the same sex). They dismissed his points regarding enforced celibacy point blank without providing any response to his main point.

However, the most disappointing aspect for me dealt with a misunderstanding that I have seen crop up before – the phrase “gay Christian.” This particular misunderstanding has been on my mind for several years now, and this is my first attempt to write up an explanation of my thoughts. I apologize if this ends up being a bit “stream of consciousness.”

The authors land on the side of the argument that appending the adjective “gay” to one’s Christian identity somehow indicates a desire to cling to one’s sinful nature; as if to say “I am a Christian, but being gay is not something that I am willing to turn over to Christ.” This line of reasoning is particularly troubling to me as I identify as a gay Christian, and it attributes motivations to me which are inaccurate while completely missing my intention in using such identification.

Here is a quick first draft of what “gay Christian” means to me:

It means I am Christian. I ascribe to the tenets of Nicene and Apostles’ creeds and hold tight to the promises found in Scripture. My faith rests in the belief the God loves me and provided the means to be in relationship through Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.

It means I am gay. We’ve probably had this conversation before. If not, ask me about it or read my previous note about proposition five from March of 2012 (wow…that was over 2 years ago…wow…).

It means that I desire to be honest in my interactions with others – I don’t want to hide the things I struggle with. I may not broadcast them, but I do want to live life with others and that involves honesty in the hard things.

It means that I bring baggage to the table when reading scripture and hearing sermons. My struggle with Romans 1:26-27 has less to do with whether or not I can have sex with a man and remain true to my faith – my struggle is whether the concept of “against nature” means that I would be trading truth for a lie if I pursued a relationship with a woman.

It means that in some sense I have reconciled being attracted to men with my faith in Christ. I believe that I am loved and accepted as I am – and that challenges me to pursue the truth of how I live my life. When I finally turned over to God the possibility that I would need to remain celibate for life, I began to have peace with being gay (and I began to have peace about possibly falling in love with and marrying a man).

It means that I acknowledge that this particular “thorn in the flesh” may never be taken away from me. I have no doubt in my mind that a miracle could cause me to wake up in the morning and be attracted to women and not men. My faith is no longer contingent on that possibility. For many years, I prayed that I would be made straight. I have often thought about leaving the faith specifically because I felt that I was caught – I never chose to be gay (which seems to indicate God made me that way), but God didn’t want me to be gay.

It means that I am particularly burdened for our witness to the LGBT community. I love Chic-Fil-A, but don’t want to eat there because of the militant response of the church in supporting the chain. I don’t feel safe at Cracker Barrel any more because of the backlash they suffered when they removed Duck Dynasty trinkets from their stores. Franklin Graham wrote in Decision magazine that Putin is right on “these” issues. In my opinion, Mr. Graham is either woefully uninformed regarding how gay people are treated in Russia, or he is broadcasting a message of hate toward LGBT people.

How can we claim to be speaking the love of God when our words and actions towards LGBT people push others away from the church and the message of the Gospel?

***copied from my Facebook account***